Parallel Programming

• Instructor: Sathish Vadhiyar
• Course number: DS295
• Credits: 3:1
• Semester: Jan 2025
• Lecture: Tue/Th 1130AM-1PM (First class: Jan 2, 2025, 1130AM)
  
• Office Hours: Fridays, 5-6 PM
• Fill out this survey form
• Microsoft Teams Link

Overview

The objective of this course is to give you some level of confidence in parallel programming techniques, algorithms and tools. At the end of the course, you would (we hope) be in a position to apply parallelization to your project areas and beyond, and to explore new avenues of research in the area of parallel programming.

The course covers parallel architectures, parallelization principles, parallel programming standards and tools, parallel algorithms, numerical methods, scientific applications and parallel system software.

Pre-requisites

Basic knowledge of computer systems, data structures and programming, and algorithms.

Grading Scheme

• Sessionals
  • Mid-term [1 No.] (February 18) – 20
  • Assignments [3 Nos.] – 30
    • Assignment 1 due: February 10
    • Assignment 2 due: March 20
    • Assignment 3 due: April 7
• Terminal
  • Literature Study Report (Due: around April mid) – 20
  • Final project – 30
    • Proposal: February 28
    • Final presentation: Final exam day
    • Final report: Next day

Resources

• Introduction to Parallel Computing. Ananth Grama, Anshul Gupta, George Karypis, Vipin Kumar. Publisher: Addison Wesley. ISBN: 0-201-64865-2. 2003.
• Parallel Computing Architecture. A Hardware/Software Approach. David Culler, Jaswant Singh. Publisher: Morgan Kauffman. ISBN: 981-4033-103. 1999.
• Parallel Computing. Theory and Practice. Michael J. Quinn. Publisher: Tata: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 0-07-049546-7. 2002.
• An Introduction to Parallel Programming. Peter S Pacheco. Publisher: Morgan Kauffman. ISBN: 978-93-80931-75-3. 2011.
• Online references for OpenMP, MPI, CUDA
• Various publication materials and references that will be posted along with the lecture slides.

Lecture Slides

• Parallel Programming fundamentals
  • Architecture – ppt
  • Parallelization principles – metrics, data distributions pdf
  • Performance profiling
  • PRAM programming model pdf
• Parallel programming standards and tools
  • OpenMP
  • MPI
  • GPU architectures (pdf) and CUDA programming (pdf)
  • CUDA optimizations
• Parallel Algorithms
  • Searching
  • Sorting
  • Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms
• Parallel linear algebra and numerical methods
  • Matrix multiplication
  • Fast Fourier Transforms
  • Dense linear algebra
  • Sparse linear algebra
• Parallelism in scientific applications
• System software

Reading Materials

For those portions for which reading materials are not given below, lecture slides above are the only reading materials.

• Parallel Programming fundamentals
  • Parallel Architecture
    • Grama et al. – 2.4, For GPU architecture
    • Google for NVIDIA A100 white paper
  • Parallelization Principles
    • Grama et al. – 3.1, 3.5, 5.1-5.6
    • Book by Culler and Singh – 2.2, 2.3
    • PRAM: Book by Michael J Quinn Pages 25-32, 40-42, 256
    • Roofline performance model – Paper by Williams et al. “Roofline: an insightful visual performance model for multicore architectures” in Communications of ACM, 2009.
• Parallel Programming standards and tools
  • CUDA – Google for NVIDIA CUDA programming guide.

Topic	MPI
Parallel programming tools/models/languages MPI communicator groups, process topologies pdf CUDA Optimizations pdf, Advanced CUDA Slides, CUDA occupancy calculator xls Parallel I/O MPI I/O pdf Parallel I/O optimizations pdf MPI-2 pdf	“Parallel Computing: Theory and Practice” by Michael J Quinn, Available with me. Pages 25-32, 40-42, 256 MPI-1: Online tutorial “MPI Complete Reference”. Google for it. CUDA Optimizations – Chapter 5 of CUDA programming guide and slides 30-34 of advanced CUDA, CUDA Occupancy calculator MPI-2: Online tutorial: http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/mpi-standard/mpi-report-2.0/mpi2-report.htm Parallel I/O Optimizations: Google for paper Rajeev Thakur, William Gropp, and Ewing Lusk, “A Case for Using MPI’s Derived Datatypes to. Improve I/O Performance”, in Proceedings of SC98.
Parallel Algorithms MPI collective communication algorithms pdf Sorting pdf Divide and conquer algorithms pdf Solving Tridiagonal systems Sample sort FFT pdf Mesh-based algorithm: APSP pdf Graph Algorithms – pdf Machine Learning – pdf Deep Learning – pdf	Collective Communications: Lecture slides, and Google for paper “Optimization of Collective Communication Operations in MPICH” by Thakur, Rabenseifner and Gropp, IJHPCA 2005 Mapping to network topologies. Section 5.1 in book “Parallel Computing: Theory and Practice” by Michael J Quinn Sorting Bitonic sort: In the book by Grama et al. Paper: On the versatility of parallel sorting by regular sampling. Li et al. Parallel Computing. 1993. (Pages 1-6) Paper: Parallel Sorting by regular sampling. Shi and Schaeffer. JPDC 1992. (Pages 2-4) Tridiagonal systems – lecture slides FFT Chapter in “Introduction to Parallel Computing” book APSP: Book: Introduction to parallel computing by Grama et al. Sections 10.2-10.4, Sections 11.4.1-11.4.6 Graph algorithms Paper: A parallel graph partitioning algorithm for a message-passing multiprocessor – Gilbert and Zmijewski – – pages 427-433, 437-440. Paper: Multi-level Graph Partitioning Schemes – Karypis and Kumar. Google for it. Machine learning Paper: PANDA: Extreme Scale Parallel K-Nearest Neighbor on Distributed Architectures. IPDPS 2016.
Sparse linear algebra pdfDirect linear algebra pdf	Sparse LA Sources [You can get these papers from me and take photocopies] Parallel Algorithms for sparse linear systems – Heath, Ng and Peyton Reordering sparse matrices for parallel elimination – Liu Task scheduling for parallel sparse Cholesky factorization – Geist and Ng Lecture slides General steps of sparse matrix factorization: Heath, Ng and Peyton – pages 420-429 Parallel ordering Heath, Ng and Peyton – pages 429-435 till Kernighan Lin Liu – pages 75 and 89 (you can read other pages on reduction of elimination tree heights if interested) For mapping: Heath, Ng and Peyton – 437-439, figures 9 and 10; Geist and Ng – sections 3 and 4 For numerical factorization: Heath, Ng and Peyton – 442-450 Dense LA Paper: “F. Song, S. Tomov, and J. Dongarra. Enabling and Scaling Matrix Computations on Heterogeneous Multi-core and Multi-GPU Systems. In In the Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Supercomputing Conference (SC), pages 365–376, 2012.” Slides on “Communication Avoiding QR and LU”, CS 294 lecture slides, Laura Grigori, ALPINES INRIA Rocquencourt – LJLL, UPMC – https://who.rocq.inria.fr/Laura.Grigori/TeachingDocs/CS-294_Spr2016/Slides_CS-294_Spr2016/CS294_Spr16_CALUQR.pdf “Communication-optimal parallel and sequential QR and LU Factorizations”, James Demmel et al., Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2008-89, August 2008.
Scientific Applications Molecular dynamics pdf Game of Life pdf DFS and Dynamic Load Balancing pdf Mesh applications pdf N-Body Simulations pdf Bioinformatics pdf	Molecular Dynamics – Paper: “A New Parallel Method for Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Macromolecular Systems” by Plimpton and Hendrickson. Sections 2-5. DFS: Book: Introduction to parallel computing by Grama et al. Sections 10.2-10.4, Sections 11.4.1-11.4.6 Mesh applications Paper: “Multilevel diffusion schemes for repartitioning of adaptive meshes” by Schloegel et al. Paper: “Dynamic repartitioning of adaptively refined meshes” by Schloegel et al. Paper: “Dynamic Octree Load Balancing Using Space-filling curves” by Campbell et al. – Section 2.5 Paper: “Irregularity in Multi-dimensional space-filling curves with applications in multimedia databases” by Mokbel and Aref – Section 4 N-body Simulations The paper “Scalable parallel formulations of the Barnes-Hut method for n-body simulations” by Grama, Kumar and Sameh. In Parallel Computing 24(1998) 797-822. The paper “Load balancing and data locality in adaptive hierarchical N-body methods: Barnes-Hut, Fast Multipole, and Dardiosity” by Singh, Holt, Totsuka, Gupta and Hennessey. In Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 1994. Bioinformatics Paper: Parallel Biological Sequence Comparison using Prefix Computations. Aluru et. al. JPDC 2003.
System Software Scheduling pdf Fault tolerance pdf	Scheduling Paper: “Backfilling with lookahead to optimize the packing of parallel jobs” by Shmueli and Feitelson. JPDC 2005. Paper: “A comparison study of eleven static mapping heuristics for a class of meta-tasks on heterogeneous computing systems” by Tracy Braun et al., HCW 1999 Fault tolerance Paper: “An overview of checkpointing in uniprocessor and distributed systems, focusing on implementation and performance” by James Plank

Assignments

• Turing cluster notes on OpenMP, MPI and CUDA for the assignments
• Assignment  1 –
• Assignment 2 –
• Assignment 3 –

Final Project

The final project has to clearly demonstrate the uniqueness of your work over existing work and show adequate performance improvements. You can work in a team of max 2 members. It can be in

• parallelizing well known algorithms or problems. Examples:
  • hybrid executions on both CPU and GPU cores.
  • graph algorithms – spanning trees, shortest paths, satisfiability, mesh generation or refinement (e.g., Delaunay)
  • sorting, searching
  • clustering algorithms
  • parallelization of fundamental algorithms you would encounter in an algorithm book. e.g.,
    1. Introduction to Algorithms. Third Edition. Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest, Stein
    2. The Design and Analysis of Algorithms. Aho, Hopcroft, Ulman
    3. Data Structures and Algorithms. Aho, Hopcroft, Ulman
• parallelizing numerical methods, Examples:
  • Dense martrix or sparse matrix computations. e.g., Cholesky, QR, Inverse, SVD, conjugate gradient etc.
  • >Transforms (FFT, wavelet etc.)
  • Any numerical method you would encounter in matrix/numerical methods book. e.g.,
    1. Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Second Edition. Hildebrand
    2. Elementary Numerical Analysis. Third Edition. Conte, de Boor
• System software. Examples:
  • Techniques for scheduling or mapping parallel tasks to processors to achieve least makespan or throughput
  • Load balancing techniques for irregular computations
  • Automatic techniques for splitting tasks among GPU and CPU cores.
  • Automatic data management techniques for GPU cores.
  • Proposing genetic programming abstractions
  • Fault tolerance

Sample Projects from Previous Years

• Finding maximum clique in hybrid system – pdf
• Parallel hybrid implementation of SVM – pdf
• GPU TSP – pdf
• GPU implementation of implicit Runge-Kutta methods – pdf
• Parallel implementation of shared nearest neighbor clustering algorithm – pdf
• Hybrid implementation of alternate least square algorithm – pdf
• Approximate k-nearest neighbor search – pdf
• Incremental Delaunay triangulation – pdf
• k-maximum subarray problem – pdf
• Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) – pdf
• AKS algorithm for primality proving – pdf
• Betweenness centrality – pdf

Ethics and Rules

Ethics

1. Please do not even exchange ideas with your friends since there is a thin line between exchanging ideas and codes looking the same.
2. Please do not look up web/books for solutions.
3. See Dr. Yogesh’ nice writeup on plagiarism policies in his HPC page

Deadlines

All assignments will be evaluated for a maximum of 10. There will be a penalty of -1 for every additional day taken for submission after the assignment due date.

Thus, you will have to be judicious regarding deciding when to submit your assignments.

Example

Suppose you have completed 1/2 of the assignment by the due date.

Scenario 1:

You think that it will take another 1 day to finish 3/4 of the assignment. In this scenario, if you submit by the due date, you will get a maximum score of 5 and if you submit a day after, you will get a maximum score of 6.5 (=7.5-1, -1 for the extra day). Thus, you will get better score if you take an extra day, finish 3/4 of the assignment and then submit.

Scenario 2:

You think that it will take another 3 days to finish 3/4 of the assignment.  In this scenario, if you submit by the due date, you will get a maximum score of 5 and if you submit 3 days after, you will get a maximum score of 4.5 (=7.5-3, -3 for the three extra days). Thus, you will get better score if you submit your assignment that is 1/2 complete by the due date than submit the assignment that will be 3/4 complete after 3 days.